- 2008 Feb 19 - 10:30pm
- 2008 Jan 7 - 2:43pm
- 2008 Jan 3 - 1:11am

Has NPR become just another mainstream military mouthpiece?
While the Iraqi government continued its large-scale military assault in Basra, the NPR reporter’s voice from Iraq was unequivocal on the morning of March 27: “There is no doubt that this operation needed to happen.”
Such flat-out statements, uttered with journalistic tones and without attribution, are routine for the U.S. media establishment. In the War Made Easy documentary film, I put it this way: “If you’re pro-war, you’re objective. But if you’re anti-war, you’re biased. And often, a news anchor will get no flak at all for making statements that are supportive of a war and wouldn’t dream of making a statement that’s against a war.”
So it goes at NPR News, where — on Morning Edition as well as the evening program All Things Considered — the sense and sensibilities tend to be neatly aligned with the outlooks of official Washington. The critical aspects of reporting largely amount to complaints about policy shortcomings that are tactical; the underlying and shared assumptions are imperial. Washington’s prerogatives are evident when the media window on the world is tinted red-white-and-blue.
Earlier in the week — a few days into the sixth year of the Iraq war — All Things Considered aired a discussion with a familiar guest.
“To talk about the state of the war and how the U.S. military changes tactics to deal with it,” said longtime anchor Robert Siegel, “we turn now to retired Gen. Robert Scales, who’s talked with us many times over the course of the conflict.”
This is the sort of introduction that elevates a guest to truly expert status — conveying to the listeners that expertise and wisdom, not just opinions, are being sought.
Siegel asked about the progression of assaults on U.S. troops over the years: “How have the attacks and the countermeasures to them evolved?”
Naturally, Gen. Scales responded with the language of a military man. “The enemy has built ever-larger explosives,” he said. “They’ve found clever ways to hide their IEDs, their roadside bombs, and even more diabolical means for detonating these devices.”
COA Tool Box
- login or register to post comments
- email this page
- printer friendly version
- Subscribe to Normon Solomon posts
- Receive COA News headlines by e-mail:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 
We’d expect a retired American general to speak in such categorical terms — referring to “the enemy” and declaring in a matter-of-fact tone that attacks on U.S. troops became even more “diabolical.” But what about an American journalist?
Well, if the American journalist is careful to function with independence instead of deference to the Pentagon, then the journalist’s assumptions will sound different than the outlooks of a high-ranking U.S. military officer.
In this case, an independent reporter might even be willing to ask a pointed question along these lines: You just used the word “diabolical” to describe attacks on the U.S. military by Iraqis, but would that ever be an appropriate adjective to use to describe attacks on Iraqis by the U.S. military?
In sharp contrast, what happened during the All Things Considered discussion on March 24 was a conversation of shared sensibilities. The retired U.S. Army general discussed the war effort in terms notably similar to those of the ostensibly independent journalist — who, along the way, made the phrase “the enemy” his own in a followup question.
It wouldn’t be fair to judge an entire news program on the basis of a couple of segments. But I’m a frequent listener of All Things Considered and Morning Edition. Such cozy proximity of world views, blanketing the war maker and the war reporter, is symptomatic of what ails NPR’s war coverage — especially from Washington.
Of course there are exceptions. Occasional news reports stray from the narrow baseline. But the essence of the propaganda function is repetition, and the exceptional does not undermine that function.
To add insult to injury, NPR calls itself public radio. It’s supposed to be willing to go where commercial networks fear to tread. But overall, when it comes to politics and war, the range of perspectives on National Public Radio isn’t any wider than what we encounter on the avowedly commercial networks.
Norman Solomon’s latest book Made Love, Got War: Close Encounters with America’s Warfare State (PoliPointPress) is available now. For more information go to www.madelovegotwar.com.
Health
Media
- 2008 Jul 17 - 6:02pm
- 2008 Jul 17 - 5:35pm
- 2008 Jun 12 - 2:30pm
Engagement
- 2008 Jul 11 - 1:53pm
- 2008 May 26 - 6:14pm
- 2008 Apr 20 - 3:03pm
Environment
- 2008 Jul 9 - 3:01pm
- 2008 Jun 26 - 1:05pm
- 2008 May 26 - 6:22pm
Economy
- 2008 Jul 8 - 3:13am
- 2008 Jun 14 - 12:26pm
- 2008 Jun 5 - 12:23pm
Commentary
- 2008 Jul 9 - 3:05pm
- 2008 Jun 20 - 12:07pm
- 2008 Jun 17 - 12:51pm
Culture
- 2008 Jun 25 - 1:32am
- 2008 May 26 - 6:44pm
- 2008 Apr 30 - 2:34am
Video
- 2008 Jul 11 - 1:42pm
- 2008 Jun 26 - 12:19pm
- 2008 Jun 5 - 7:44pm
Politics
- 2008 Jul 17 - 1:45am
- 2008 Jul 11 - 1:42pm
- 2008 Jun 20 - 12:07pm


